View Single Post
Old 06-23-2006, 01:22 PM  
JD
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 22,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by gfydotcom
Hi guys,

This is aaron from the site in question of this thread. I've been in discussion with Chris today and hashed through a few issues regarding the photo pages on the site.

The fact of the matter remains that if all these posters on this thread are in fact webmasters with the respective sites represented, it would appear you no longer wish for me to be an affiliate nor promote any of the sites. As I told Chris, I've gotten emails months ago (none since) regarding how some webmasters may not approve of large photo galleries, while others are satisfied with the traffic/conversions I've sent and appear not to have issue. I would have to scroll through the names and cross check my affiliate info to see who is saying otherwise on this thread (or you can send an email via the form at the advertising link just above this post).

The site is an entertainment venue, not a "porn" site per se and as such is geared that way. The audience currently being sent to any of the porn affiliate links are going to be those who've come for general entertainment (with a higher out-of-country viewer base) and get encouraged to check out the galleries.

That being said, a 10 photo spread is not going to be "entertainment" to the casual visitor, more of an advertisement.

What I think might be an amicable solution to webmasters who can appreciate such a concept, and like I told Chris, might be to set a brief window of ideally 14 days for a larger "entertainment" type gallery to be actively promoted, then scaling the same gallery back down to whatever those who've voiced concern can feel more comfortable.

please please please don't do that again. I'm crying here
JD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote