iwantchixx

2 20732 0.92% http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view
3 18050 0.80% http://images.google.com/imgres
6 2529 0.11% http://images.google.co.uk/imgres
7 2368 0.11% http://images.google.ca/imgres
11 1417 0.06% http://www.altavista.com/image/results
12 1313 0.06% http://search.yahoo.com/search
15 923 0.04% http://images.google.com.au/imgres
16 891 0.04% http://www.google.com/imgres
20 668 0.03% http://images.google.de/imgres
21 649 0.03% http://www.alltheweb.com/search
22 590 0.03% http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt
25 537 0.02% http://images.ask.com/fr
28 382 0.02% http://www.google.ru/search
29 378 0.02% http://us.wap.yahoo.com/p/search
32 313 0.01% http://uk.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view
33 304 0.01% http://images.devilfinder.com/go.php
37 263 0.01% http://fr.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view
38 262 0.01% http://www.ask.com/web
40 237 0.01% http://images.google.com/images
48 184 0.01% http://alltheweb.com/search
50 177 0.01% http://it.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view
51 171 0.01% http://images.google.co.nz/imgres
55 150 0.01% http://ca.search.yahoo.com/search/images/view
56 138 0.01% http://www.google.de/imgres
58 135 0.01% http://search.nifty.com/webapp/imagesearch

Yeah they can do alright, mostly image search traffic though. So make your posts attractive to catch attention when they load you in a frame and it will do just as fine as text searches.