Rolo

Yes, I am aware that YouTube and its clones are happy to call themself OSPs, however it has yet to be confirmed by the courts (the chance might come with the Los Angeles News Service lawsuit)

IMO "If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, then it?s probably a duck"

As I wrote, then the weapon of choice is ignorance, and I do not expect any YouTube clone to suddenly say "Yes, we are not as ignorant as we state" - it would kinda make it hard to stay in business

However I had hoped that the adult YouTube clones were less clones and more about business, since we as an industry have somewhat the same goals, which is making more money (well, at least I hope that is what everyone is looking to do). Of course as I and others have learned, then we do not agree on which are the priorities to reach that goal - most likely because the YouTube clones are looking at "taking", while we are looking at "making"

But as the thread starter asked, then I would also like to know how the adult YouTube clones are looking at the new 2257 regs?

__________________
Surfmastering : a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery