Some quick points...
FSC won a supreme court case in 2002 FSC vs. Ashcroft or vice versa. It was regarding the COPA ruling which tried to define any material that is simulated or appears to be underage be illegal. Basically if a 40 year old girl was acting out a role as a high school girl with pig tails that would be illegal. FSC struck that down.
Avn has no problem getting 2257 info from its advertisers thus they wont be bogged down by 2257 webmasters are the real targets. FSC's larger members actually didnt want the smaller webmasters to be protected, but FSC went ahead with the widespread injunction covering all members.
Not only does the FSC hire lobbyist, it has partnered with the ACLU and several other groups to further its cause. Actually they had the ACLU write an amicus brief regarding 2257
60% of america is on dial-up so the whole video side of the industry is done shit is ridiculous. Dont ever forget who really runs this industry, THE VIDEO SIDE
Mainstream media is very aware of 2257 in its original inception 2257 was going to encompass hollywood as well until there lobbying efforts changed the writing of the statue. They pay very close attention to 2257
Just some points to add...You have good intentions, but I think you need to do more research.
just my
