|
I would have to agree that the FSC doesnt communicate with its member base very well, especially those members who are chipping in just a few bucks. A rep to discuss some matters on the boards would seem to be of good value to the FSC, but there are obvious issues with this. Any FSC rep on this board would immediately be asked to provide legal advice and people here would not be satisfied with the general, non specific answers that replying on a message board like this demands.
Right now the FSC is actively litigating cases that impact the adult industry in Colorado and Utah. Huge amounts of money are being spent in these cases. The FSC was involved in the .xxx and have been working on developing guidelines for the industry to impose self regulation. Self regulation would seem to be a difficult path to take due to such an emphasis on self interest among the industry, but self regulation has worked before in the past, most recently in Europe in the mobile market.
I dont think its feasible that the FSC should be held to a standard that they are a prepaid legal defense team for its members. There just isnt enough money raised through its membership base to offer this as a viable option.
Mike South, $1000 a year wont get you much hand holding by a law firm in your state but you seem to be asking for that and alot more from the FSC.
__________________
|