View Single Post
Old 09-08-2006, 01:02 AM  
MegaPartnerJerry
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
The only thing in the whole deal (9-11) that I?ve had issues with is Building #7?s collapse. It makes no sense considering the limited damage from structural debris + fire from the main WTC towers; buildings much closer to the main towers suffered much worse damage from debris and fire, yet they were completely fine afterwards (well, at least they stood and were in no threat whatsoever of falling... wouldn't quite call them fine). FEMA?s own report was fairly inconclusive as to why #7 fell, mainly because by the time they got to inspect the site the majority of the evidence (the structural steel) had already been removed and sold.
Good Point, never thought of that.
MegaPartnerJerry is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote