Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jensen
I haven't recieved any emails from Gerco since February and assumed there was no further problem as the header was altered and we had a nice chat to work things over.
I have just written to him after Rockatansky alerted me and offered my apologies. The content was not supposed to be there and that is my responsibility. The galleries have of course be changed and I'm waiting for his feedback on the header/tour.
I have also offered him a fee for damages and would be happy to comply with whatever he thinks would be fair in this case. My apologies to Gerco once again...
|
Jensen, we have never met, but from having visited your site and getting a sense of how you seem to conduct yourself, I believe you are sincere and operate ethically.
When I saw this post, the claims did not balance with impression of your biz.
Gerco, as you raised this alarm (on a public forum), can you please explain the diff in communications? It sounds like Jensen understood the matter to be resolved. Did you send further communications which were left outstanding and unanswered?
While there is no excuse for content being published without permission, when purchasing and/or inheriting a web realm, there may be skeletons the new owner is unaware of.
Is this just a case of the communication trail broke and the complainer assumed the 'alleged offender' was no longer cooperating, while the 'alleged offender' assume the matter was resolved - aka unneccesary drama which could have been resolved with an escalated attempt at communication (ie written registered letter, phone call).
What am I missing here?