Quote:
Originally Posted by damian2001
1. Lars does nothing, ignores Zango - Affiliates lose sales, Lars loses sales - Zango wins
2. Lars buys spots - Affiliates lose sales, Lars recoups some lost traffic (and can afford nice bonuses) - Zango wins
3. Suggested by Will - Lars buys "blank" pops - Affiliates gain on sales but lose on bonuses because Lars is paying money to Zango - Zango wins
Anyone seeing a pattern here?
Do you think perhaps we are fighting with the wrong people?  |
4. Lars announces a policy that AFF will not deal with Zango in the future and will ToS any affiliate sending traffic through Zango or similar sources. -
AFF wins in the eyes of its affiliates