View Single Post
Old 10-17-2006, 05:54 PM  
SureFire
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: internet
Posts: 4,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peaches View Post
If you think about it, programs now would be smarter to play with companies like Zango and a handful of the whales instead of spending large amounts of $$$ catering to the minnows in the pond.

There are a lot of "behind the scene" programs that make millions and don't have more than 20 affiliates and they are by invitation only.

At some point, smart business owners are going to sit down and see how much ROI they get for giving out $200 of free drinks and lap dances to someone who sends them 2 sales a month, in addition to the salaries and benefits they are paying employees to cater to the "little guys", plan lavish parties, etc.

I know 99% of the posters here don't want to hear this, but if a lot of these "companies" start actually acting like buisnesses and have P/L statements, etc., having small affiliates really won't be worth the effort.
Peaches, how many 'little guys' go to shows? How many 'little guys' ask for special favors from reps?

I am a 'little guy' and play by the rules...I expect any company to respect this and not screw me over. My two or three or x amount signups a month are not costing them anything but to cut the check and postage.

Last year my AFF was a couple of hundred negative and I kept my links up (it all worked out). With cams.com, last month they double paid me and not one person via email could respond..my links are still up and I did cash the check (it will work out again).

I am not pulling any links and I do feel 'little guys' are worth the effort to keep...most of them are honest and are not looking for a free ride.

BTW, I am Little Gal
SureFire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote