Quote:
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
Clearly this thread is mislabeled and twists words and meanings. Honestly it would of gotten just as many views and a lot less flack attacks to the poster if he/she would of stuck to the real facts and the issues at hand.
The outrage should be focused with the fact that they are attempting to imply that pornographers are a danger to a neighborhood and to their children. Suggesting that all pornographers are in someway after peoples children.
Attempting to twist the words though to say they are being called sex offenders is no better than doing what the opposition is doing here and in many other areas. Twisting words and jumping to conclusions.
That said like it or not both sides have their rights and arguments. Pornography always stands behind the shield of the freedom of speech, and alas so is this group. They are not breaking any law, just like most of us.
What many may need to come to grips with though is that some of us are pornographers and some of us are advertisers for pornographers i.e. profiteers of porn. There is a great deal of stigma attached to it, like it or not. The opposition also are very organized unlike ourselves, and they have watchdog groups and reporting sites to monitor and keep track of many of us. The have quick link sites to turn our sites into Governing agencies, including local D.A.'s and other individuals. They also explain to people how to research the information and find who may own certain sites and the like. Also keep in mind that just because they may be bible thumping zealots, they have many technically inclined participants. They also have a great deal of funds to attack their enemies with, so buying mailing lists and infiltrating the ranks is well within their means.
It all boils down to that we chose this career path and accepted the stigma that is attached to it. You may think that nobody ever will find out, you may feel that it can remain a very hidden secret. In reality though it can and more like will eventually turn up if someone is inquisitive enough.
|
"The outrage should be focused with the fact that they are attempting to imply that pornographers are a danger to a neighborhood and to their children. Suggesting that all pornographers are in someway after peoples children."
Thanks for being succinct, that is exactly what my point was, and thought it was evident. There were, however, no words twisted or mislabeling because it was all taken from the story from the arizona republic.
they were called 'sex offenders' in the headline to the story. Search any engine for 'northeast valley coalition against porn' and you shall see.
also, I guess I need to resort to making it easy for everyone so here is a

with the words every one can not see.
hope that helps,