Quote:
Originally Posted by hershie
OK, I totally agree that if they are in fear of losing their processing and thus business, that justifies them doing what they have to that is still legal to stay afloat.
But, that doesn't seem plausible given what else they have said, like it represents such a small percentage of traffic...(if they are on verge of losing their ability to process if they lose zango signups then I would have no problem with them lying to hide this fact to protect their company's lifeline).
If they need zango to stay compliant with visa, that is deeply disturbing to affiliates and clients i imagine and what about targetting their competitors and all the other stuff that doesn't support your contentions.
|
Buying contexual marketing from adware companies has been a practise of some of the largest companies on the Internet today for many years past. If you aren't aware it is one of the BIGGEST advertising mediums there is. Now you expect everyone to all of a sudden stop and lose that revenue stream all because one person got all hot an bothered. It's been an acceptable traffic medium for many years now undergoing many laws mandating certain requirements that Zango seems to be following. Will76 didn't even check his own programs use of Zango which has been IMMENSE for the last 4 years. This is a serious concern to anyone who wants to know Will76's true vendetta. let's see ClickCash against AFF? Hmm........