Quote:
Originally Posted by jimthefiend
Ba. You're smarter than that. Not telling fucking DJ on GFY is not the same as refusing to tell a Nats client who asks.
|
Basically it's refusing to tell an affiliate what needs to happen for them to get credit for a sale.
Affiliates already know that a sale has to pass through scrubbers by a third party processor like CCBill or through a gateway. And, affiliates know, and we as an industry accept for good reason, that a % of valid sales will get turned away in exchange for protection from heavy chargebacks and fraud.
Now, NATS is coming in with a layer on top of that. What % of valid sales won't affiliates get credit for? What stops affiliates from getting credit?
If a gateway or processor like CCBill has approved the sale and will payout on it to the program, why wouldn't an affiliate get payment at that same time as well?
Why is NATS trying to be a fraud detection system now? Yet another HUGE mistake on their part IMHO. Just serve up the damn promotionals in various fancy manners, provide affiliates with their link codes, and count the damn sales. Leave the fraud detection to companies that specialize in processing.
This is the type of stuff that's going to make affiliates BlubberCunts itch....