Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkJedi
No offence, but I'd like to hear the explanation from NATS, first hand.
They are the software developers after all.
Unless these unverified signups get refunded or voided out, affiliates should get paid on them.
Its comedy that they would not even tell us what it is or the concept behind it.
Is it a riskier transaction? ie, a user that doesnt log in (first of all, the site/client is responsible for a large part of those, as they could be having user/pass/access issues on the site, and they could control that), but if it's in inherently an issue of a riskier transaction, then apply the credit when the chargeback or refund comes in. Or even 'hold it' for a month or 2 until you are comfortable paying it out, if its not refunded or charged back by then.
|
Why should NATS have to explain it? It's right in the flashcash terms, it's FC's job to explain it, since they use it, and they do in the terms. FC has done this for years, I'm not sure why you don't see that either.