Quote:
Originally Posted by BoyAlley
So while you CAN control affiliates NOT getting paid for sales through the use of a magic voodoo algorithm, you can't control whether or not affiliates get paid for sales that have never been chargedback or refunded?
I'm still relatively new to this industry so could someone please define the word "skim' for me? My understanding is that it's basically a program getting paid for a sale, but never crediting the affiliate that sent them that sale for it? Is that about right? Or am I confused and mistaken? Someone help the faggot?
|
NATS, could control the payouts/programs. But that is up to the program owners. I can charge you or credit you for chargebacks/refunds. I can fine you, I can split processing fees, eat them, or make you pay them all. I can force to pay on active trials, or not pay you on web900 signups or pay you less of a % on check signups. It's my program, to run my way, my style. Just like every program, nats or not..
NATS is bad ass, it can be different from the rest, we don't all have to be the same.