I would like to take a minute to post in here and try to return this conversation to a rational discussion.
DarkJedi, if you have issues with FlashCa$h the place to address them is at
[email protected] or better yet, since this has gone so far already directly to me at
[email protected] I have already ICQ?ed you but I you haven?t replied. The FlashCash forum is in the process of being replaced and is not being regularly checked anymore.
If your ratios or % of verified signups have changed since the switch to NATS I need to know that. To me you are a valuable partner and if something is wrong I want it fixed so that you will also be a happy partner. NATS will do everything in their power to make sure that if there is a real problem it is fixed, it doesn?t matter if you and John get along or not, they want me to be happy, I want you to be happy. We are all working towards the same goal here if we can put aside the anger and get the problem solved.
To briefly discuss the idea of verified signups; we are one of the only, if not THE only program to offer instant payments on FREE trials. This is a huge fraud magnet, requiring an enormous amount of man hours and technology to detect and prevent that fraud. We have found the delicate balance between very strict fraud prevention/detection and good conversion ratios, but it is a fine balance. Verifying that a signup is real is the price to be paid for being able to be paid instantly for these free trials. There are various methods that are used to verify a sale, some are already public, some are not, but detailing them for everyone makes them all useless. If you are concerned that this process is too strict please get in touch me and we can talk about it.
These are all very valid issues for any webmaster to raise, but raising them in this way on gfy where they will quickly morph into charges of scamming and shaving doesn?t help the problem get solved and in the end everyone looks bad.
I would also like to specifically address the claim made yesterday that ?All of the FlashCash webmasters are having the same problem?. This is simply not the case. In general our ratios and % of verified signups have stayed the same before and after the switch to NATS. I realize that this is GFY and we all get carried away, but please refrain from making broad generalizations like this as again no one gains from this.