Quote:
Originally Posted by will76
WHY ? they are being cautious and proactive. Damn, you think someone would commend them for that and you say " I wish someone would sue their ass" ? wtf ?
I wish more companies acted this way. Instead people do the opposite they take girls who just made 18 and make them look 14.  and then wonder why they get complaints and heat from the govt. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by will76
And this is different then all other webcam companies... how ?
|
I know they are cautious as hell when it comes to protecting their own ass.
Though I refuse to commend any company that feels it is being "proactive" by discrimination. The girls would be of legal age to work, yet are being prevented from working because their body does not look mature enough. This of course is in addition to their strong rules that prevent performers from acting young, using the word teen without 18 or 19 attached, and so forth. Punishment purely on the shape of a girls body. So yes they should be sued.
I do not care how ifriends is different that other webcam companies. For some time ifriends had some sort of electronic device that law enforcement officials was supposed to request from ifriends. This device would allow law enforcement to check each photo etc. This was to go into effect with the updated 2257 laws. No idea if they kept this.
Regardless they encourage the performers to make as much content as possible. Often their cameras took pictures automatically via grabs on ifriends end (this may have been disabled now). They also encourage them to make personal sites, fan clubs, promotional material, promotional sites, and of course they automatically become clickcash affiliates. Yet they keep most performers in the dark about 2257 laws and just saw "we take care of it". Despite the fact that the performers are primary producers as well as secondary producers (sometimes).