Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
You do have a hardon for arguing down to the split hairs, I'll give you that.
|
No, I have a hardon against misinformation and mistaken assumptions. Everyone in this has assumed that Directnic was trying to do a 2257 inspection (they were not, from everything I have seen... only trying to enforce the terms agreed to into their registration agreement), and just about everyone thinks they OWN a domain. They own the rights to use a domain, an ongoing agreement, with the contractual rights to reassignment (ie, selling the rights) but they don't actually own the domain.
It might seem like splitting hairs, but it is the difference between a girl talking about getting pregnant and actually having twins.