Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Webby, all I can say is this: I wish you would apply the same standards to Slick as you do to Directnic. He too made his bed, and he has to lay in it.
Your entire accusations against Directnic are based on (a) the charges of Slick, status questionable, and (b) an email that was never copied, lost in an apparent disk crash.
I am thinking that there is way more to know, and your jump to a conclusion on Directnic (or on Slick) is way early in the game.
|
I can't apply the same standard to Slick - I don't know the details about any alleged offenses - and neither do you. It's an ongoing issue.
DirectNic is not in doubt - that facts are known and they have acted on their "opinion". I contacted DN myself to establish some elements - their response was abysmal, (read DUMBO) and certainly not a company I'd trust with domains.