DirectNIC should not have jurisdiction over this. According to safe harbour provision, they should put the material down when they receive a notification, but must also restore it once they receive a written note from Slick - NOT proof, just a signatory note. After this, if shit hits the fan, it's Slick's fault.
They did the wrong thing, Slick's business is hurting, and he should not be apologising. They should be.
Edit: im not a lawyer, consult your local legal authority
|