Quote:
Originally Posted by Linguist
DirectNIC should not have jurisdiction over this. According to safe harbour provision, they should put the material down when they receive a notification, but must also restore it once they receive a written note from Slick - NOT proof, just a signatory note. After this, if shit hits the fan, it's Slick's fault.
They did the wrong thing, Slick's business is hurting, and he should not be apologising. They should be.
Edit: im not a lawyer, consult your local legal authority
|
People its in their TOS he agreed to, end of story. This sue them and they didnt have the authority. The TOS he agreed to stated they did. Also if we dont start policing ourselves for this type shit ,its going to get worse. WAKE UP !