Quote:
Originally Posted by sarettah
Many people on this board have spent the past few days stating that DirectNic, as a registrar, did not have the legal right or authority to take the actions they did. In fact, it has been taken to the point by some that what they did it is in actuality an unconstitutional infringement on Slick?s free speech rights when they apparently arbitrarily shut down Slick?s sites. Further it has been stated that ICANN does not allow Directnic to take the action it did.
|
The only valid point is what may be decided by a court. If anyone wishes to challenge a registrars "rights" - do so. Your lawyers offices are probably open on Monday morning.
If Slick's lawyers elect to take action, that's his biz based on the specifics of any claim/challenge. I'm sure DirectNic can speak for themselves and if they so desire, produce a politically correct statement to justify their action.
Pissing matches of "opinions" on GFY do not count.