12-16-2006, 08:02 PM
|
|
So Fucking Gay
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,714
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj_purve
if slick did nothing wrong, why didn't he just provide the 2257 when he was asked instead of bringing it here?
my laymans understanding of 2257 is that anyone has the right to ask for it if they are involved in business with that person in any way ... for example, I always get requests from webmasters for 2257 for models I shoot ... webmasters have a right to know that they are promoting legal content (even if they aren't buying it to publish themselves) ... a registrar should have the right to know if they are providing an address for legal content to be viewed at.
|
Uhm...............................
ok.
1. They "technically" didn't ask for 2257, because although their original email to him didn't say so, they came back and said the IDs JUST needed to show pic and DOB and everything else could be edited out. Whether that's still a violation of privacy laws I have no idea.
2. He was gathering docs, because they gave him several days (until the 18th I think) to show them, but turned him off the next morning, something like 5 days early.
3. Your understanding that "anyone" is entitled to your actual 2257 records is seriously flawed and likely to get you into trouble.
4. I hope for your own sake your model releases specifically allow you to pass out the types of personal identifications that you're apparently handing around like candy. And, even if it does,
5. If you're really producing content, and these are your views, I suggest you consult with an attorney. It sounds to me like you could use some guidance....
|
|
|