View Single Post
Old 12-30-2006, 10:02 PM  
directfiesta
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
directfiesta's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Punta Cana, DR
Posts: 29,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post

The no-fly zones were also a resolution. This wasn't something that was open to discussion; This was put into place so that Saddam couldn't drop chemical weapons on the Kurds. I mean, he did it once; What's to stop him from doing it again? So we had the no-fly zones and the US and UK patrolled them. And guess what..... Iraq had the damn balls to fire on the planes. Daily.


[/I]
BS ...

Quote:
The Iraqi no-fly zones (NFZs) were proclaimed by the United States, United Kingdom and France after the Gulf War of 1991 to protect humanitarian operations in northern Iraq and Shiite Muslims in the south. Iraqi aircraft were forbidden from flying inside the zones. The policy was enforced by US, UK and French aircraft patrols until France withdrew in 1998. While the enforcing powers had cited United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 as authorising the operations, the resolution contains no such authorisation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_no-fly_zones
iraq couldn't fly in their own airspace ...
__________________
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
directfiesta is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote