View Single Post
Old 02-21-2007, 09:27 AM  
gleem
Confirmed User
 
gleem's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sunny Land
Posts: 5,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by CashLikeWhoa_Mike View Post
if it ain't broke don't fix it.



Bigger isn't always better, and a lot of bells and whistles like cascades, nats etc. don't always equal more sales
how can you say that? On my program, if CCBill rejects the surfer, it goes to the next biller and 10 -20% of the time it converts to a sale.

So by using ccbill only if they do $1million a month in sales, they are automatically losing $100k - $200k by not having a second biller in a cascade.

by not having a second biller, their conversion ratios are lower, by 10-20%

wouldn't they want to announce to their affiliates:
"we added a second biller so you will see a 20% increase in your conversions and checks this month!"

adding a cascade isn't complicated. seems retarded to me.
__________________




Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com
gleem is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote