Quote:
Originally Posted by Peaches
I haven't made a mistake. I have stated my views. You and I have different opinions on this. Period. End of story. You were the one who started with ad hominem attacks (yeah, we folks in the woods who can't read use big words too).
|
Oh really let me begin:
Me: Those people have been proved guilty in a court of law, I think thats his point
You: Do you ever watch the news? See when they arrest people and they show their mug shot? You're in ATL - how many times has the guy who shot up the courthouse been on TV? How many news articles have been written about it? Hell, the chick who turned him in has written a book. Has he been proven guilty in a court of law?
Please people. These are CHILD SEXUAL PREDATORS and you're trying to give them more rights than the guy who robbed the local bank for $2K.
Then I say because I wasnt defending anyone constitutional rights: I dont understand that one everyone knows he did it but its going to cost 1.2 mil for his defense.
You: Jeepers, dude. You just contradicted yourself. So it's OK to show coverage on a shooter, but not a child predator. In fact, the shooter shouldn't even have a trial, and you're screaming for rights for sex predators, lol. Brilliant.
Tell me please where Im screaming for predator rights?