Quote:
Originally posted by Probono
My daughter's first experience on AIM was a horror of adults trying to solicit a 14 year old girl. It really does both me as a parent. I took the time to explain it to her and she learned but it is one reason why this industry is under such scrutiny. We are held accountable for every pedophile who uses the net to solicit.
I am a STRONG advocate of http://www.asacp.org/ and believe all of us have a duty to embrace their program.
|
I agree, but soliciting of a 14 uear old like this has nothing to do with spamming or even porn for that matter.
I think these pedophiles trying to lure young girls should be caught, castrated and hung......but I don't like to see it equated with spam.......
We already have a bunch of people in the press who always links chatroom luring to the porn industry and that bugs me and it demeans the victims.
Pedophiles and predators are in our society, our churches and even online. Educating children is paramount and a neverending job. Parenting is difficult and isn't getting any easier. Parents need to be educated and they need to, in turn, educate their children.
While I agree spamming of public chatrooms where children hang out is wrong, but the owners of chatrooms who have adult material should also do what they can to keep children out. It's a two way street. I realize a chatroom operator can only control so much, but it's not hard to put filters in public rooms where a child might visit. I'm not talking about the kid who stumbles into Lesbian ButtFuckers chatrooms, but a fucking Harry Potter chatroom should have some semblence of fucking control.
Personally, I don't want spam in chatrooms where children hang out because children don't have credit cards and make no money...they only burn bandwidth and piss of parents and politicians....