Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent
What would be quite ironic, is for ICANN to view all of those that send in their support for .XXX to see if they use ICRA or RTA labelling right now or in the past using archive.org.
|
just got to the footnote:
2 ICM recently reviewed websites operated by or affiliated with those who expressed support for .xxx, and compared them with a site operated by approximately fifty, randomly selected webmasters who have opposed .xxx. Though admittedly not scientific, the comparison is instructive: 93% of the sites operated by ICM supporters employ warning pages, age verification tools, and password-limited access. In comparison, less than 40% of the sites
operated by ICM opponents have such practices. Nearly 80% of the sites operated by ICM supporters have ICRA or other labels, compared to 20% of those operated by ICM opponents. These differences emphasize the distinct needs and interests of the adult content webmasters who
make up the sponsored community. (They also illustrate the tensions and transitions taking place within the industry, which are thoughtfully discussed in Dick Thornburgh and Herbert S. Lin, eds., Youth, Pornography and the Internet (CSTB 2002).)
"trust me" is all i hear.
Fight the independent, third-party, unbiased analysis!