Quote:
Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat
nothing against these adresses (don't know most of them) but you're missing the key email adresses of the ICANN board directors there
and personally I don't think sending this thread to ICANN will accomplish anything
IMO a few different people need to take a few hours of their time again to write some longer reply to ICANN regarding the claims and accusations of ICM presented in the newly published documents
EDIT: what sucks though is that ICM are reading this thread right now probably, so we can't really discuss our strategies public on GFY anymore,.... at least not everything....
|
Wish the owner(s) of GFY could somehow/legally stop the ICM monitoring; in fact, it'd be nice if the GFY owner(s) came out strongly against .xxx publicly ----MANY, MANY, MANY posters/readers of GFY might appreciate it and respect such GFY opposition to .xxx, and be relieved to know that GFY is not part of the so-called group of "24" that ICM counts as supporters??? Just my personal opinion!!! We know that YNOT has long been against .xxx, but can anyone enighted us about the other "leaders" and boards????