Quote:
Originally Posted by vicki
Exactly my point, we have no figurehead committee to be the voice for our industry. We don't have an entity that represents our cohesive majorities .. because of this we're an easyier target for all.
|
that's not true.. FSC represents over 3,000+ webmasters who are their members, and have been very vocal against .XXX
If you are not an FSC member, then your statement is true.. .you don't have a figurehead committee that voices your concern.
The 'sponsored community' has been defined in the application as basically any adult webmaster that wants labeling and wants .XXX
This is how ICM is pushing ICANN to adopt .XXX because it claims it passed the definition of the community, because there are supposedly 24 companies in adult that wrote in support and over 1,500 adult webmasters writing to them (yeah right), and over 76,000 domains pre-registered (they didn't disclose how many were unique businesses signing up and also, those were done as defensive moves, not to be counted as voting of a yes).
The latest ICM documents to ICANN are up there to try and discredit the opposition to show that only a few are causing noise, and that they do have some level of representation.
There is opposition work going on.. and FSC is definitely involved.
Fight the 411!