Originally Posted by AdultDeals

I've generally given up on this 'argument' since it is best left up to the experts. I do follow the discussion and evidence on both sides, but at the end of the day I'd rather err on the side of caution when our environment is concerned. Even among scientists this is a very hot-button issue.

Fortunately most countries have adopted Kyoto and other regulations to decrease the amount of pollution their companies produce. I think the most important argument is what the proper steps are to reduce air pollution and water pollution and other things that have an undeniable impact on us. Any type of greenouse gas benefits will follow suit. I don't think anyone on either side would argue that making cars cleaner and factories cleaner and not dumping toxic materials into rivers and water supplies is a GOOD thing.

I support regulations on companies to produce clean vehicles and factories and power plants. That has a direct affect on quality of life for everyone. Whether humans are directly causing a greenhouse effect will be debated for years to come, so I for one will watch as an interested bystander.