Originally Posted by Adult Lounge - Brad

According to the footage that you can see in the movie that I was talking about that was filmed from a camera on the roof of a gas station near the pentagon it was not a large plane but something smaller, either a small plane or a missile. Like I said, watch the movie and then tell me what you think.

Consider the wing span on a 747 and the size of the hole in the pentagon. Also consider the height of the tail. Now remember the footage, did you ever see any of the plane on the exterior of the pentagon? Where did it go? If the hole is smaller than the plane then reason dictates that the debris should be on the outside of the building, but we never saw that. Further, if jet fuel had spilled on the grass (which it would have) they would have had to excavate the ground and certainly would not have allowed fire crews to be as close to the building as they were.

In response to your other comments:

Do you know any structural engineers or any civil engineers? When they build buildings that are at risk of being hit by a plane, they take extra precautions to ensure that a direct hit would not result in what happened to the WTC buildings. When the WTC was attacked in 1993 by 1500lbs of explosives detonating from the basement resulting in a 30m hole that went up to the 5th floor, the building did not fall as expected. This is due to clever planning and most importantly engineering of the building. People dedicate their lives to this stuff.

I said ?Just about as logistically IMPOSSIBLE as a terrorist flying them into the tower? because if it is ?impossible? for one party to fly a plane into the WTC then it must also be ?impossible? for another party to complete the same feat.