Originally Posted by Phoenix

the fires burnt much much hotter and for much much longer
yes some of them actually lost the outer shell. near the firezones...look at the pics.
small airplanes have hit buildings a lot..but lets not go there because the planes that hit the towere were much bigger...so id hate for you to focus on that one point and start screaming while you jump up and down.

btw the real main support at thw WTC was the 47 steel girders that ran up the middle....they should have been just fine and standing there when the supposed panackae theory was going on....but wouldnt you know it..there they were all over the ground in neat little 30 ft pieces....hey this is just facts..i dont know what they mean

the 47 main support beams should have been standing there shooting up way into the sky..but instead a huge building made of concret and stone collapsed on on itself neatly into a small pile....huge beams were thrown 400-500 meters away.
explosions in the basement when there is no direct passage to it doesnt get explained with some kerosene.

most of the kerosene btw probably blew up on impact and flooded the floors the planes went into....when it got there it probably accounted for the huge huge fireballs that ripped from the buildings whilst the planes hit...kerosene/gasoline etc does not take time to ignite..it goes right away...very little liquid got far away from the intial impact zone id guess

why were dogs ordered out of the building months and months before by the security firm running the WTC? who owns that firm?

why were huge sections of the building closed down to all but essential personell, deemed nessecarry by the security company. Not even the building maintenace guy, who could basically say hey this is my building i been here for 20 years i run this place..why wasnt he allowed anywhere....all of a sudden he doesnt have clearance to go where he wants.

i dont know..just some questions

why was the steel that was still red hot 6 weeks after shipped to china for melt down right after? it is a federal offence to remove evidence from a crime scene. how did that happen? no investigation was done on the rubble.
nothing notta zilch

more was spent on clintons blowjob investigation then was spent on the 9/11 investigation...does that sit right with people?

anyway...i know there are logical explanations for all of these...so if anyone can just show me...without going crazy and calling names...just give logical explanations...dont quote popularmechanics...you know many editors quit or were fired during the writing of that article. i could write an article saying whatever, if it was what the masses wanted to believe they would believe it.

hell id say it on tv with a pocket protector and some glases on wearing a lab coat...and i could say anything i want. Science is the new religion.

i