View Single Post
Old 03-31-2007, 07:22 PM  
Porn Farmer
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo View Post
I don't believe in a comparative religions course in high school since there are simply too many religions to compare. But I do support it in the context of teaching history. My brother was in high school and was talking about the crusades (when Kingdom of Heaven came out). They learned about the crusades, but none of the religious implications behind it (the school wasn't allowed to). It just amazed me that we can't teach our children basic history without getting into a religious debate.

But I agree, religion and science aren't the same thing. They have no business being taught in the same class. The reason it is an issue is because most science contradicts religion. It's hard to read the bible and then find a fossil that is hundreds of thousands of years older than the bible says the world is.
Agree with pretty much all of what you say. I agree it should be covered in history class but Splum is framing the debate (like all religious wackos do) as religion vs science. His agenda is transparent. Science class is for science, as it should be.
Porn Farmer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote