View Single Post
Old 04-04-2007, 08:03 PM  
Boobzooka
Confirmed User
 
Boobzooka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: BOOBZOOKA.COM
Posts: 626
Quote:
Originally Posted by c-lo View Post
My 2257 Understandings:[LIST][*] For all sexually explicit material, whether real or simulated, and/or material depicting nudity (ie nipples, vag, dick) that is hosted on my website, I must retain a copy of a valid ID for all depicted persons.
I'm not sure about that and/or depicting nudity part. You won't see breast surgery, mammography, breast-feeding, or medical sites required to hold 2257; I'd bet not tattoo sites, naturalist/nudist, or fine art either. Unless the definition was rewritten(?), it's still got to be "sexually explicit". Where that blurry line is finally drawn is open for debate, but if I were in the secondary producer position, I really wouldn't be too worried about softcore topless pics. It's simply not a strong case, with non-discrimination laws being passed now to allow women to breastfeed and be topless in public, a bare boob can hardly be called explicit. And what about a person just standing there naked? That's not necessarily sexually explicit either. A spread vagina or an erection is probably over the line. Such a silly thing to have to try to define. I'm trying to look on the bright side and hope that maybe this will bring more tease to how adult sites are promoted, but I figure it'll just be more of the same coming from offshore. To make US affiliates happy, I will be working on 2257-safe .zips of non-explicit teaser content and a 2257-safe RSS feed.
__________________


BOOBZOOKA
: Amateur Affiliate Program featuring SellYourSexTape: Real couples document their lovelife for one week.
HerBedroomWindow: Girls recording themselves alone at home. | DareRing: "Truth Or Dare?" themed adult party games.
Boobzooka is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote