Quote:
Originally Posted by Webby
Yes... there must be evidence trying him into the offense - else it's junk. Frankly, unless there was a total miscarriage of justice here (and kinda doubt that because of the judicial procedure) - there was evidence tying the defendant to the crime - tho, know that is contested on the video.
|
What actual evidence exactly?
The information that has been released in the court docs were that there were 200 samples from the crime scene and no matches to him. The only evidence were scratches on his right shoulder blade that when you look carefully match up with his excuse that it was from carrying the casket (bruising).
AGAIN...I realize this is not an american court system. BUT, there is no loose evidence or hard evidence here. If there is, point me to it