Originally Posted by Webby

Won't address the idiot - he's just too ignorant, clueless and clutching at straws and little to do with the "adult entertainment industry".



Totally agree with this!! When you look at the whole "package" as any jury would do, - and if there is only one sole purpose to that package, in this case to basically market to pedos - it is very hard to defend this.

It's clear why this is done by design - satisfying the fantasies of pedos is a huge market and the people involved also know this from their "success rate". All they care about is money - if dog fucking was legal (hell knows if it is in whatever countries) - it is poss they would purvey that. Bottom line - there is no judgement in publishing - it's clouded by dollar signs.

This "content" is illegal in a fair number of countries - would love to see a few asses in courtrooms trying to defend it in these countries. It may clean up the mainstream adult industry for a few years