|
So who IS looking at this site, if not those with fantasies of much younger girls? I have a very appreciative eye for the womanly form and like the (PIC) posts as much as anyone else; yet I find nothing at all entertaining or sexually enticing about LL. I wouldn't feel very good about myself if I did, especially considering that I have a 12-year-old daughter. What is particularly telling is the striking difference between the photos of this model on the LL site as compared to the previously posted Spanish website featuring the same model.
And I also feel this was a very important post yet was mostly ignored by those making their arguments:
US Code Title 18 Chapter 110 section 2256 - Definitions for chapter
paragraph 8:
(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
.................
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
paragraph 11:
(11) the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.
|