Thread: LittleLupe.com
View Single Post
Old 04-25-2007, 03:31 PM  
stickyfingerz
Doin fine
 
stickyfingerz's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Webby View Post
Still going on??

This thread is too brain dead thanks to Daddy of the Year's lobotomy, but was fun

Dammit - screw this "adult entertainment" biz everyone needs to dump all adult sponsors and switch over to purveying images of little girls being fucked and pandering to sicko pedo fantasies - the "pedo entertainment" biz is much more profitable

Pity there is hardly more than a few valid posts (mainly from real webmasters) of any substance out of the whole of this thread - and not one who stood up and offered any legitimate defense of the site (apart from "it's legal" bullshit - it's not).



BVF:



Sure.. this is correct BVF - it was random - the "portrayal" could be.... anthing from 11 thru to what? Pushing 15?


AaronM:



You are very quiet my man


Another valid point...

NikKay:



You have mentioned the law in your post NikKay and this is relevant - not just in respect of US law, but elsewhere. To the north of you in Canada, "little girl fucking" is covered by the Child Protection Act where the portrayal of models to appear underage and involved in sexual scenarios is a criminal offense - same in a many other countries. It's considered to be pedo content already.

Basically agree with your comment above - any youngish model can look underage in a few random shots. This is clearly not a "few random shots", - the girl is styled to look as young as possible for the shoot and "decorated" with kiddy toys etc - all with one aim which is already more than clear.

My main "gripe" is firstly of pedo-pandering to human trash. Until a few years back, was kinda naive to this area until I got an "education" into the world of pedos and their victims from law. In the process met a number of victims and .. sheesh.. will never forget, but don't want to discuss here. Many pedo's themselves are victims who were abused and them proceed to abusing others - and some are just downright "evil" and have little thought to killing their victims.

Second "gripe" is this supposed to be the "main stream adult industry" - WTF Since when did "adult entertainment" involve portraying kids on imagery and pandering to the world's human waste??

Only my , but don't consider there is much difference between actual CP and the producing CP fantasies and claiming these are legal (which is actually untrue anyway) - all of them just crawled out of the same swamp

There are many ways of skinning a cat - and look forward to seeing this type of alleged "content" being hit - time and again
Still no comment on the quickbuck site huh? Just more of accusing people of pandering to pedos. The main difference being. This girl doesnt imo look anywhere near 12. She is actually 20 years old. So what if she was wearing an adult diaper? Would people think she was an infant? Its fantasy. LEGAL fantasy.

You will continue to avoid commenting on the quickbuck site, and continue being a hypocrite. And stop calling it CP it is not. CP involves a CHILD that girl is an adult.
stickyfingerz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote