|
My responses in red.....
The top of the building fell, bringing down all of the weight on top of it.
This would take 4-5 minutes, now the tower fell in free fall speed without any resistance beneath meaning the lower floors where already gone.
Fire didn't bring down the buildings. Not sure what you saw that morning, but I saw two very large fucking planes - HUGE planes - plow into the two towers. The damage to the structure itself might have been enough to bring down the towers, but it didn't. The combination of the original impact, the resulting fireball, the damage to the structure itself, and multiple fires on many floors is what brought down the buildings.
Have you ever been to the WTC? I have. The entire building is an airlock. When you go outside at that height, the wind whips around. Imagine having a fire that high up with the wind flaming the flames.
The towers where designed to withstand several hits by planes equal to the size of those that hit them on 911. Fire cannot melt steel under no circumstances and it cannot weaken it in such a short period of time.
There are examples of buildings of lower quality construction that have burned for many many hours without collapsing.
The buildings were designed to withstand impacts high up in the tower with a plane full of fuel. Well, that didn't seem to work too well. I've read what they planned for and I don't think anyone could have planned for this.
And yes, lesser buildings have have similar impacts - The Empire State Building had a WWII bomber crash into it.
Building 7 wasn't hit by a plane. But it suffered damage from debris falling, was on fire also, and not to mention both towers fell and it's debris covered the entire area.
Building 7 had minor fires over 2 floors, there are lots of picture evidence to prove it. That in no way explains the perfect implosion of the entire building. It just doesnt make any sense at all.
During the 1989 Loma Preta earthquake in San Francisco the Bay Bridge fell as well as other bridges. Do you mean to tell me that the falling of the two towers, being hit by hundreds of tons of debris isnt' enough to sink that building? If one of the World Trade Center towers fell next to my house it would be burried in rubble - and my hous would fall.
There were multiple explosions at many different levels of both WTC towers. On one of them (or perhaps both) some of the elevators shot down to the main lobby and created a fireball in the main lobby. This happened on multiple floors, and I'm willing to guess on any floor where there was a "sky lobby".
Witnesses say they heard explosions in sequences, firefighters, nearby civilians and others have all suggested this. There are just too many witness reports of explosions in different places in the towers to discard.
Seismic data even shows explosions right BEFORE the planes hit the towers.
I have never heard of this.
I watch for this every time I see footage of the towers falling and I do in fact see something. It sort of looks like a puff of smoke. This "puff of smoke" could be nearly anything. Perhaps it's debris from above; Perhaps's it's some kind of a gas or water line exploding as the building above it starts falling. Hell, perhaps it's the steel or concrete giving way as millions of tons of crap fell on it and it couldn't hold the weight.
If you look at videos of controlled demolition, these puffs are always there in the exact same fashion as on the world trade center towers.
They are. Like I said, the building was falling. I dont have an degree in engineering but it sounds reasonable to me that if hundreds of tons of concrete and steel above a certain joint... that somewhere something is gonna shift and shift hard.
I have no idea who Larry Silverstein is and frankly I don't care. I read this statement as "we've decided to pull all personel from this building because, duh, it's on fire".
Do some research, he owned the place and got HUGE sums of insurance money. He insured the building right before 911 specifically covering acts of terrorism.
That's right, I remember now. I haven't heard this but it doesn't mean much to me.
This has nothing to do with anything. I'm not sure what this chap or his buddies heard, but it could have been anything. And being as it happened before the plane hit, well, doesn't mean anything. If it happened before the plane hit it didn't bring down the building.
Of course it mean something, this suggests they took out the base support. See the comment on the seismic data above.
I'd love to hear more about this.
We should look into this. I think a two year study of trading patterns over the past ten years will reveal many things about how Jewish companies and other companies operate. The thought line here is that a number of Jewish companies did some odd trading deals the day before 9/11. I'm sure that if it's looked into, tens of thousands of companies of interest - Jewish and otherwise - didn't do anything special that day or the day before.
This really does not need an explanation, even you suggest something fishy is going on.
It's easy to swtich stats around. You can say "thirty jewish companies made odd trades that day". But what they don't say is that there are forty thousand jewsish owned companies who did nothing that day, and the fact that on any given day or week ten thousand jewish companies make similar trades.
I don't think we are sure exactly who each and every one of them are. It's entirely possible that we have wrong information on some of them.
Oh yeah? They say they found their passports. And its pretty bad if they accuse innocent people about acts of terrorism.
The found passportes which they used to enter the country. These passports were created by which govenment? Not like you can't fake any of those. In fact, it's not like the US government can't fake those too.
What would be normal standard operating procedure be in the event that multiple plans are hijacked and rammed into tall buildings at multiple locations? Seems to me this wasn't a miltiary thing but a Federal Government thing, being as planes are run by the FFA. And when the FAA called the Military they said "well, you guys need to get some planes up or something".
If you look into the standard procedures of the involved parties you will see that if everything was in order, they would have intercepted the planes. People who worked with this stuff suggest it is impossible to explain the situation in any way other than a standdown.
Seems to me our military on 9/11 wasn't paying any attention to any of this. This was being handled by the FAA. I mean, even the FAA didn't have any clue there was a problem until after the first planes hit. By then it was pretty much over.
I just watched a show about 9/11 the other day. The guy from the FAA calls up NORAD (or whatever it was) and says "I think you guys need to scramble some planes or something".
I don't think the military had any idea what to do, and the fact that it all happened so fast and there was a lack of information / incorrect information caused them to pretty much do nothing.
Anything else?
How about a backrub?
[/QUOTE]
|