"really? i see people who believe in conspiracy's doing the exact same thing... "finding answers" they want to believe and labeling those that question them as if there is no other side to the story.
is that fair, balanced and objective? or is that someone trying to prove something rather than taking an honest look at the evidence and accepting where it leads... no matter where it takes them?"
I have looked at and keep looking at both side of this I honestly don't think the truth will ever be truly known.. there are to many facts that point both ways... there are always 2 sides of a story... Nothing should just be taken at face value... If you find something explaining why something could not happen then search for information saying why it could happen.
I have posted some info in this thread and yes it looks one sided but really only one side is asking questions. The people that think the US Gov't did it are not asking questions...
So I will ask some - Why would the Gov't do it.
- if you think war in Iraq then why - if you think oil in Iraq then again why not say Iraq did it...
Why wouldn't the Gov't do it... They stand to lose way to much if they were ever found out.
There are many many more questions people shoud be asking on both side... But we all know this will never happen on GFY... there is no drama in people trying to find common ground or explaining there points in a open environment.
Not everyone that questions 911 drives home in a tin hat.. some people are just looking for more info.
|