06-08-2007, 01:31 PM
|
|
Tube groupie.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: LoScandalous, CA
Posts: 13,482
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites
Bullshit. She was on summary probation which means she was not assigned a probation officer and did not have to report to anyone. It also means that, under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one is not violated unless it is for an identical offense. In her case that would be a second DUI during the term of probation, which she did not have.
She apparently was stoped on two occasions with a suspended license and under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one would have paid a fine on the first offense, and possibly, just possibly, one would have been sentenced to, possibly, just possibly up to 72 hours in jail, to be served at the discretion of the Sheriff depending upon jail crowding. Most, if not all jails in California are grossly overcrowed.
The judge in her case was out of line in her sentencing and if he overrides the decision of the Sheriff to place her under home arrest he will be out of line yet once again.
She is a celebrity but she should not be treated differently than the average person would be and yet she has been. She has been treated worse because of her celebrity and was actually placed in maximum security (solitary confinement for her own protection) which is harsh and is usually reserved for problem inmates.
|
You are on crack:
http://www.snizzshare.com/view_video...70e9a56ceeabc4
Or maybe it's just me.
|
|
|