Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo
I know, 6151 is the code that requires you to pay it.
Those required to pay are those who are required to file. It states so in 6151.
The Privacy Act thing is one of the weakest arguments made by these sites. There's a ton of court cases that have rejected every one of these arguments from US vs Wunder, Salberg vs US, US vs Holden, Lonsdale vs US, US vs Neff, and US vs Hicks.
You can argue that the courts are all wrong, but the judicial branch has the job of interpreting law. If they say the law stands and rejects the case, then it stands. Are you saying that the courts are all wrong? The only argument you can make is based on that, since every issue you brought up has been ruled on by our courts over many decades.
And I've read through sites like that. They have interesting interpretations of our laws. But it doesn't matter what they think, it matters what a court says about it.
|
The problem comes from the fact that the courts benefit from the law and that puts them in direct conflict to even rule on the law. This law is a catch 22 when it hits the courts.
We would not need an income tax at all if we used tariffs properly and stop hiding behind "free trade" Like our wonderful free trade with China. Our products shipped to China get a 25% while their products shipped here only get a 2.5% tax!
