Quote:
Originally Posted by Trixxxia
At the seminar, a point was brought up about URLs and the lawyers agreed that as it's written, every address with what is deemed explicit would need the ENTIRE 2257 statement - which would also mean that every image would need to be on an HTML with the statement below it. Now when you build thousands of galleries a year, you know what that will do to the TGP/MGPs/Free Sites/Blogs & their submitters? Programs can probably handle the transition but a lot of you, will have to go back and change the galleries, scripts will have to be modified to scan and accept HTML pages from the thumb - the actual thumb will probably need it's own HTML page too.... Brace yourselves if it's not clarified, modified or removed from the new recordkeeping rules!
|
Good point, I dont know how many people are aware of the burdensome of this rule. Whether every image needs to be on its own html page or whether some sort of reference system is created per each web page referencing each image to the 2257 info and date is pretty much impossible.
Even if these rules only apply back so far its would be our burden to prove that and its probably better to do it for everything.