View Single Post
Old 07-21-2007, 01:57 PM  
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear View Post
i dont think so , i think it was a perfectly normal assumption for the average webmaster to think tsm had something to do with it

he def went about it way too quick but his assumption was based on the FACTS he had at the time , FACT was the traffic was going there so he assumed they bought it..

now we know a bit more of the story the facts have changed so it was premature to suspect a no ref code link meant the program was at fault.

once again the moral of the story is do as much fact checking as you can before you fly off the handle.
The facts at the time don't mean shit in court though. Just ask Richard Jewel how he feels about the facts at the time.
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook