Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo
I would disagree. Her best legal chances are against the guy who made this thread and essentially called her a crook. The hotel clearly made a mistake, but that mistake didn't force others to defame her. The evidence was still very flimsy at the time.
You called her a thief and a crook. You said she shouldn't be trusted in the industry. Free speech means nothing if you called her something she is not and it hurt her reputation. Caza was probably the most careful in the thread, but his insinuations fueled the fire.
|
quote what i said and don't take out of context.
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.
|