Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
I'm guessing you didn't read the entire thing.. what is posted in this thread's first post, is just a very small part of the updates. I'd suggest you read the entire thing.
|
I already read through it and the only correction I need to make is that I meant to use the word depiction not picture.
See:
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...f/E7-13500.pdf
Above the waist depictions are fine no matter how arousing. Just keep in make sure you don?t run afoul of the other existing definitions of sexually explicit already in 2256. In the Federal register they say what they want the test to determine if a depiction is a lascivious display of the pubic area vs. a non lascivious display. It makes more since if you read the Federal Register yourself because no matter how well someone else explains it they leave something out and it creates misunderstandings.