Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertine
Ehm, a tiny hint. Vaclav Klaus is NOT a scientist specialized in the environment. The same goes for Al Gore, George Bush, Arnold Schwarzenegger, the economist whose article on newsbusters you link to, the guy who made the documentary this thread is about, etc.
Your implicit statement that there is no scientific consensus on the matter is simply untrue. Rather than argue the point myself, I will present you with a link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scienti...ic_co nsensus
Undoubtedly, you will still disagree. After all, your dissent stems from politics, not science. So, rather than looking things up for yourself and checking the sources, you will just say Wikipedia isn't reliable.
Something similar would happen if I were to point you towards relevant open access journals ( http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=subject&cpid=78 ), so whatever I do here, I'm pretty much wasting my time. |
Vaclav Klaus isnt a scientist? What the hell does that have to do with his commentary on the IPCC concensus myth?
And are you joking? First of, I dont see an effort in that Wikipedia entry to point to those who disagree.. They list some organizations.. which most points to the IPCC report as evidence... and even those who dont, ever thought that some of those scientific organizations might be corrupted at the top? But theres nothing to gain from pushing the man made global warning theory.. uh? And I am not telling they are.. but could they?
I find quite amazing that people dont get cynic and skeptical when a world elite are just about to introduce a Global tax on Carbon which ofcourse regular citizens will end up paying..