Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertine
Quote:
|
Ehm, yes? Scientists who dispute the claims get heaps of media attention, and show up time and time again. Just Google "Lindzen" and see the hundreds of thousands of hits you get. Hell, the Financial Times published the Vaclav Klaus dreg.
|
Yet, 99.9% of people never heard of those 2..lol
Quote:
|
Ehm, those who denounce the theory get grants as well - check the other thread I linked to in my first post in this thread.
|
some of them yes.. but not the majority...
Quote:
|
Organizations are composed of individuals. Obviously, an organization that represents several thousands of scientists carries slightly more weight than a single individual.
|
really? Lets take AAAS... what is your understanding regarding the number of their scientists studying the Global warming human link...? And how many agreed and disagreed? And was there interference involved (ex. grants if you support one side)?
Quote:
|
a conspiracy including thousands of eminent scientists.
|
|
again.. believe or not what Vaclav Klaus said about corrupted scientists..
"It's neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment."
But ofcourse.. you think the corrupted ones can only be on the other side..
Ok folks.. im out.. see ya later..