07-31-2007, 10:19 PM
|
|
|
So Fucking Gay
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,714
|
Is Someone About To Get Prosecuted For 2257 Violations? Did anyone catch this?
I haven't seen this Xbiz article mentioned on here, maybe I missed it:
Keeping Line Open on 2257
http://www.xbiz.com/articles/82414/2257
There's a lot of great clarification packed in that article, so check it out if you haven't already. I was pretty impressed with how forthcoming the FBI was in this interview.
Also interesting to note at the end:
Joyner = FBI
Quote:
Joyner: On a related note, I did want to mention some re-inspections that have occurred. If a company has no violations, we are unable to inspect them again for at least four months. Some companies have violations and failed to resolve them. This is bad and leads to a re-inspection. If they continue to have violations, this indicates a deliberate disregard of the law.
XBIZ: You mentioned that "some re-inspections have occurred" and "some companies have violations and failed to resolve them." To clarify, have there been re-inspections wherein the producer failed to resolve violations noted in their initial inspection?
Joyner: Yes.
(Note: Joyner could not discuss further these re-inspections, or the unresolved violations, as they pertain to specific inspections, and Joyner is not authorized to discuss specific inspections in detail.)
|
Sounds to me like a company may be thumbing their nose at the Feds, or be unable to comply for some reason? Reading between the lines, whoever this is, they're not making the DOJ very happy.
The article makes it sound like the FEDs were trying to give this company every chance to get into compliance and it's not happening for whatever reason.
Might we be hearing about a prosecution soon?
|
|
|