Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
see i don't see how you could come to this conclusion the only way in which
1. the ids were valid
2. they could have been 16 at the time of production
3. and further investigation determined both performers were of legal age
would be if the production date on file was miss marked by 2 years.
nothing about that circumstance demonstrates that they could negligently hire an underage performer since at the time of shoot they would have/did do the math correctly.
|
I have no idea what happened, what I quoted was directly from the article as stated by "Joyner" who is the fbi guy; he was the one who said the performers were of legal age and the company kept piss poor records.